Loss Contingency for a Verdict Overturned on Appeal Essay

Accounting for a blemish Contingency for a Verdict Overturned on Appeal May 2007, W filed a consider against M for patent infringement. For the year ended December 31, 2007, management of M unyielding that a evil for this matter was probable and represented that the estimate of loss was in the range of $15 million to $20 million, with $17 million being the most likely come up of loss within the range. A instrument panel trial took place in September 2009. The jury reached a verdict on September 24, 2009, and a judgment was ordered in favor of W. The judgment required M to pay W $18.5 million. In November 2009, M filed a Notice of Appeal with the Court of Appeals. In December 2010, the Court of Appeals issued a impression in favor of Ms appeal and reversed the lower courts belief on the matter. This meant that the Court of Appeals overturned the jury verdict and the $18.5 million judgment against M. On January 6, 2011, W filed a petition for a re-hearing before the same panel of appellate judges against the reversal of ruling by Court of Appeals. On February 10, 2011, the appellate judges declined the petition for a re-hearing. On February 28, 2011, management of M determined this matter was closed upon discussions with in-house legal counsel.Required1. For the year-end December 31, 2007, financial statements, what amount should M track record as a liability?2. For the year-end December 31, 2009, financial statements, should M adjust its liability? If so, what amount should be recorded and should the amount of the adjustment be considered a 2009 event or a prior period adjustment?3. Should M record the reduction of the previously recorded loss contingency